DataVertex vs. People Data Labs: Which Recruitment Enrichment API Is Better for Recruiting Products?
- Claire Liao

- 3 days ago
- 5 min read
If you're building a recruiting product today, chances are you've evaluated both DataVertex and People Data Labs (PDL).
Both platforms provide large-scale people datasets through APIs. Both can power candidate search, enrichment, and recruiting workflows. But they were built with different goals in mind.
Rather than declaring one platform "better," this guide compares where each solution fits best so you can decide which aligns with your product roadmap.

At a Glance
Category | DataVertex | People Data Labs |
Primary focus | Recruiting technology | Multi-industry people & company data |
People dataset | 800M+ candidate profiles | Large global people dataset plus company data |
Company dataset | Not currently available | 60M+ companies |
Natural language search | ✅ Yes | No (structured queries) |
Semantic search | ✅ Yes | No |
Job description search | ✅ Yes | No |
Candidate contact data | Extensive validated personal email & mobile coverage | Available, but generally lighter coverage and validation rate |
API Pricing model | Browse up to 100 candidates for one search credit | Charged per returned record |
Delivery | API | API + Data License |
Best suited for | ATS, AI Recruiters, CRM, Sourcing Tools, Staffing Agencies | Analytics, GTM, Sales, Investment Intelligence, Recruiting |
Different Philosophies
Although both companies expose people data through APIs, they were designed for different use cases.
People Data Labs is a general-purpose people data platform. Its customers span sales technology, marketing technology, fraud detection, investment intelligence, HR technology, and analytics. It offers APIs alongside bulk data licensing and company datasets.
DataVertex is purpose-built for recruiting products. Every API endpoint is designed around recruiter workflows, sourcing experiences, ATS integrations, CRM enrichment, and AI recruiting agents.
This difference influences nearly every aspect of each platform.
How Industry Experience Shapes the Product
The backgrounds of a company's founders and product team often influence how a platform evolves.
People Data Labs
People Data Labs has built its platform around collecting, organizing, and delivering large-scale people and company data for a wide range of industries. Its products support use cases spanning sales intelligence, marketing, investment research, fraud detection, workforce analytics, and recruiting. This broad customer base has led to a highly flexible data platform that can be adapted to many applications.
DataVertex
DataVertex was founded by a team with years of experience building products for the HR technology industry. Before starting DataVertex, the founders worked with and alongside dozens of recruiting platforms, sourcing tools, applicant tracking systems (ATS), recruiting CRMs, and talent intelligence startups.
That experience shaped the product from day one. Instead of starting with a general people database and adapting it for recruiting, DataVertex was designed around how recruiters actually search for candidates, review results, enrich contact information, and integrate these workflows into recruiting products.
For engineering teams building recruiting software, this recruiting-first perspective often translates into APIs, search capabilities, and workflows that require less customization to fit recruiter expectations.
Search Experience
One of the biggest differences is how users search.
People Data Labs
PDL's Search API is extremely flexible but primarily expects structured SQL or Elasticsearch-style queries against hundreds of available fields. This provides significant power for technical users building custom search logic.
Examples include:
title = "Software Engineer"
location = "London"
company = "Google"
For engineering teams building sophisticated data products, this flexibility can be valuable.
DataVertex
DataVertex focuses on helping recruiters find the right candidates faster.
Apart from supporting structured search queries, it also supports:
Natural language search
Semantic search
Job description search
AI-friendly search experiences
For example, users can search with prompts such as:
"Senior backend engineer with Kubernetes experience in New York who has worked in Fintech industry."
This makes it particularly well suited for AI copilots and conversational recruiting products.

Credit Consumption
Pricing models can significantly impact product design.
People Data Labs
PDL generally charges per returned person record.
If a search returns 50 candidate records, each returned record consumes credits. Their documentation also notes that repeated enrichment requests for the same profile incur additional charges unless customers implement their own duplicate detection.
DataVertex
DataVertex separates searching from enrichment.
A single search credit lets users browse up to 100 matching candidates before deciding which candidates they actually want to enrich.
For recruiting workflows where recruiters often review dozens of profiles before selecting a few, this model can be substantially more efficient.
Recruiting Workflow vs General Data Platform
People Data Labs serves many industries.
Examples include:
Sales intelligence
Marketing
Investment intelligence
Fraud detection
Workforce analytics
Recruiting
That breadth makes PDL attractive if your application needs both people and company intelligence.
DataVertex deliberately focuses on one market: Recruiting technology.
That specialization shows up in features like:
Candidate search
Candidate enrichment
Recruiter-friendly search
ATS workflows
AI recruiter integrations
CRM recruiting workflows
If recruiting is your primary product, using an API designed specifically for recruiter behavior often reduces product complexity.

Company Data
This is one area where People Data Labs clearly has broader coverage.
People Data Labs
Offers:
Company search
Company enrichment
Company datasets
Bulk company licensing
This is valuable for:
Sales platforms
GTM intelligence
Market research
Investment research
DataVertex
Currently focuses exclusively on candidate data.
If your product also requires company intelligence, PDL may support that.
Contact Information for Recruitment Enrichment API
Both platforms include contact information, but they emphasize different priorities.
People Data Labs includes personal emails and phone numbers where available across its global dataset. Customers of People Data Labs may stitch it with other contact providers for contact enrichment use cases.
DataVertex places a stronger emphasis on recruiting-ready, high-quality contact information, with extensive personal email and mobile phone coverage from a robust built-in waterfall enrichment, along with a high email validation rate to support candidate outreach.
For outbound recruiting products, contact coverage can have a meaningful impact on recruiter productivity.
API Integration Experience
Both companies provide REST APIs, SDKs, and developer documentation.
The difference is less about the technology and more about the workflow each API is designed to support.
People Data Labs exposes a broad platform intended to support many different industries and use cases. That flexibility gives developers significant control but may require more application-specific logic when building recruiting experiences.
DataVertex's APIs are organized specifically around recruiting workflows, making it easier to implement features like candidate sourcing, recruiter search experiences, candidate matching, talent rediscovery, ATS database refreshment, and AI recruiting assistants with less custom translation between the API and the product experience.
AI Recruiting Products
The rise of AI recruiting agents is changing how recruiting products search for talent.
Traditional search APIs often assume users will construct filters manually.
Modern AI assistants instead generate searches directly from natural language and job descriptions.
This is where DataVertex's recruiting-specific search capabilities can simplify implementation, particularly for:
AI sourcing agents
Conversational recruiters
Recruiting copilots
ATS platforms
Recruiting CRMs
Staffing Agencies building internal products or workflows
When People Data Labs May Be the Better Choice
PDL may be a stronger fit if you need:
People and company data together
Sales or GTM intelligence
Investment research
Bulk data licensing
Workforce analytics
No extensive contact information enrichment
When DataVertex May Be the Better Choice
DataVertex may be the stronger choice if you're building:
Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS)
AI Recruiters
Recruiting CRMs
Candidate sourcing platforms
Recruiting automation software
Candidate matching products
Talent intelligence platforms
Especially if you value:
Natural language/Semantic search
Job description search
Candidate matching
Recruiting-first APIs
Higher contact information coverage
Credit-efficient candidate discovery
Final Thoughts
People Data Labs and DataVertex are both excellent APIs, but they optimize for different outcomes.
People Data Labs is a broad people data platform serving multiple industries with extensive datasets, company intelligence, and flexible search capabilities.
DataVertex is purpose-built for recruiting software. Its APIs are designed around how recruiters actually discover, evaluate, and engage candidates, making it particularly well-suited for ATS platforms, AI recruiting agents, sourcing tools, staffing companies, and recruiting CRMs.
Ultimately, the right choice depends on the product you're building.
If your platform is centered around recruiting workflows, recruiter productivity, and AI-powered talent discovery, a recruiting-focused API can often provide a simpler implementation and a better end-user experience.

